Misuse of Power!

Kia Ora,

Not talking about the abuse of power by the likes of the UN, US, Gaddafi or the central banks or any of the other many groups that do it in 'our' name.

What this is about is the misuse of the extreme power that Civil Defence has here in New Zealand during an emergency as has happened as a result of the Christchurch Earthquakes.

That Civil defence need these extreme powers is not in question. It is how they are used.

Biggest issue is still the communication & there was a very good article on this in the Christchurch 'Press' pointing out that just telling people something is out of bounds but at this stage they are not sure why is often enough.

Again I go back to the day of the earthquake on 22nd February 2011 when people were sent to Hagley park for information where none was forthcoming. At the part of the cordon that day were I was assisting we were able to just place people aside who came to wait for friends or relatives trapped in a building behind us where the stairwell had collapsed(not the Forsyth Barr building). Just that simple action people were very thankful for.

It is something Civil Defence have to look at for the immediate actions by its people at gathering points. They need to have their people been able to think on their feet which is not what they are doing in the initial response at present. Also in line with that the aiblity to think & use the skills that arrive to assist at the time. In the first few hours of an emergency all the hands that can be used are required.

The communication even at this point was extremely poor.

Right now the communication needs to be better & not hiding what buildings are in danger. What communication there has been is very poor also.

For example in the Christchurch 'Press' there was a map of buildings that had been red stickered. But that map was highly inaccurate in many ways. It showed sections, even roads where there are now none & haven't been for years.

As for the buildings shown as red stickered it is grossly inaccurate. In the vicinity where we are workiing at present it shows two buildings on one part of a street. In fact there are at least another 10 buildings with red stickers in that short part of the street. On one side there are three businesses with yellow stickers though it is hard to see them remaining due to damage from other buildings to their sides. They are the only premises not red stickered & one of the business owners of another premise has tried to claim that his premises were safe.

On the opposite side of the street only one building does not have a red sticker & it appears to be leaning with large cracks. In fact the one building that looks OK has red stickers all over it.

But then there is the issue of the red stickers. Many properties have two. One from USAR(Urban search & rescue)or EQC & one from the council. The council are trying to keep their little empire going by saying that USAR can not red sticker a building under the Building act. My understanding of the powers of Civil Defence (having been part of Civil Defence) is currently things like the Building act take a back seat. Safety is the overriding concern.

Again though it comes back to communication & working as a team which is not what seems to be happening. The council wasted resources by going over what had already been done. Where as if there had been better communication resources would of been better used. It also needs the likes of the Christchurch City council(that is the part that delivers the services not the elected people though some of them need a lesson in it as well) to understand the powers Civil Defence have.

You also do not need a city councillor who is living in the red zone(no one should be but that is another issue that Civil defence need to sort for the future) moaning because he can't bring friends into his place for some drinks. Shows a lack of maturity & questions whether he should be allowed to be an elected representative.

At present working in the red zone at night it is quite clear that the area is far too dangerous for general access or even restricted supervised access can be dangerous.

So Civil Defence have got that part right but their lack of communication is showing how they are misusing their power.

It led to the frustration that caused business owners to breach the cordon opposite one of the most unstable buildings in the CBD. But as they did not know that, they claimed they were safe & the cordons where not as necessary as claimed. That building certainly looks Ok, but it isn't. As police officer who asked us where it was said had just come over their radio "if it starts creaking then run like hell". Many been from out of town have no idea where they are. GPS & maps don't help fully as things change on a daily basis & what was a safe route yesterday is now fenced off it confuses the issue. That information needs to be available to the public to give them an idea with issues Civil Defence are dealing with.

I see that Civil Defence now have admitted they have a list of unstable buildings, 37 I think was the number of most concern, but they will not release what those buildings are. Poor communication. First thing that needs to be done is correct map shown of out of bounds streets within the red zone updated accurately daily(as it does change daily as more buildings become unstable)& naming of those buildings most unstable again updating on a daily basis.

Even within the red zone the information to the military, police & private security is contradictory. Each group gets different information & again it changes daily. One large building is unsafe then safe on its own right on a daily basis. Their information is often at complete odds to that been given on the Canterbury earthquake site to the public.

Right now there is only one issue. Communication, communication, communication. Give people the facts.

One rumour that has gone around is the plague of rats. Well of all those I have talked too whilst working in the red zone I am the only one who has thought they have seen a rat & it was just one. Lots of cats(many obviously pets as friendly up to a point)a possum, ducks a friendly seagull & a couple of spooked eels. Other than that little in the way of wildlife. In fact apart from a cat & a seagull there was no wildlife for days. Then a duck walked down the road also quite friendly. But rats maybe one. Now having worked around that area in the past there are usually a few water rats spotted.

As far as we can work out most of the rats have either been killed by liquifaction which is significant around the river or they have left. You can smell spoilt food but as most of that will be in fridges or freezers so rats will not be able to access it.

As I type the business grouping is saying it is going to hold another protest today. I would urge them to refrain from any breaches of the cordons as it just puts their lives & those of police & military personnel who have to remove them.

Civil Defence are not abusing their power but they are misusing it by not communitcating. If they think they are then they have to think again.

So many have done so well learnt lessons from Septembers earthquake then even more now & have adapted quickly that is except Civil Defence. In the inititial stages to best use that power they possess they need to be able to think on their feet better. In the follow up they need to co ordinate better, but most of all they need to work on their communication. Get the facts, even if they change daily & contradict, out there so everyone is on the same page.

They also have to understand the New Zealand mindset better. Unmanned fences will be breached where as they might not be in other countries.

If they use that power to good with good communication then despite the delays the population will go along with them.

http://www.foxhoundsecurity.co.nz